|
February 13, 2012
For the complete legislative update, download the CCAE & CAEAA Legislative Update (PDF).
Upcoming important dates:
February 24 Bill Introduction Deadline
March 4–5 CCAE Leg Day (Sacramento)
April 27 Policy Committee Deadline (fiscal)
May 11 Policy Committee Deadline (non-fiscal)
May 25 Fiscal Committee Floor Deadline
June 1 House of Origin Deadline
Superintendent Torlakson Provides Strong Support for Adult Education
In a strong showing of support for adult education programs throughout the state, Superintendent Tom Torlakson recently distributed a letter to county and district superintendents and charter school administrators urging them to take a closer look at the value of adult education before considering sweeping adult education funds. The strong support from the Superintendent and California Department of Education for adult education provides a sense of hope in these challenging fiscal times.
To review the letter, please see http://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/el/le/yr12ltr0210c.asp.
Join the Fight for Adult Education at Leg Day
On March 5th, representatives from the adult education community statewide will descend upon the Capitol in Sacramento to fight for maintaining adult education in California. While categorical flexibility has been disastrous for adult education, nothing could be more concerning to the community than the Governor’s categorical consolidation budget proposal moving forward without setting adult education apart. In this regard, we are in the fight of our lives. All adult education stakeholders across the state are urged to attend and help in the fight to protect adult education.
During legislative visits participants will be speaking with members and staff regarding the field’s opposition to the Governor’s budget proposal and support for CAEAA and CCAE’s jointly sponsored bill being authored by adult education champion, Assemblyman Mike Eng.
Please be sure to join us for this important day and ensure your voice and support for adult education is heard!
For more information, please visit the calendar page.
LAO Releases Education Budget Analysis
The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst Office (LAO) recently released its analysis of the education proposals included in Governor Jerry Brown’s FY 2012–2013 budget plan. For the most part, the report argued in support of the Governor’s education proposals and recommended the Legislature act in accordance with the plan’s overall policy goals. The LAO, however, took issue and expressed concerns over the almost $5 billion in temporary tax funding assumptions the Governor included in FY 2012–2013 budget calculations. Recall, the Governor’s proposed initiative would temporarily increase income taxes on the wealthy and raise the sales tax by half a cent. Since the Governor’s tax increase has yet to even qualify for the November 2012 ballot, the LAO recommends the Legislature re-evaluate the Governor’s back-up budget plan, which outlines heavy cuts to school Proposition 98 funding, in the event the measure fails to qualify or is rejected by voters. The report suggests lawmakers should consider implementing immediate spending cuts that could later be back-filled should the temporary taxes win voter approval.
For more information, please see http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/education/proposition-98-020612.pdf.
PPIC Poll Finds Mixed Review for Brown's Tax Plan
According to the latest Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) report, a majority of California voters (56%) support Governor Brown's tax measure to resolve the state deficit. That said, the same voters have mixed feelings about the array of proposals that will be before them – notably the tax measures. As you well know, the Governor is in the midst of a full court press to persuade voters to pass his tax proposal in November. When voters are provided the details of the plan and the fact that the tax increases would spare education from further cuts, over 60% of likely voters expressed support for the plan. However, when asked specifically about an increase in personal income taxes, over 60% indicated they were opposed. The only tax idea that won support in the poll was raising income taxes on the rich, garnering 68% support.
For more information, please see http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_112MBS.pdf.
February 11, 2012—Daily News Los Angeles
By Barbara Jones
Call it a school for second chances.
High-school dropouts can go there to earn a GED or diploma. Veterans, laid-off workers and young adults with vocational aspirations can learn a trade. Immigrant parents can acquire basic English and math skills so they can help their kids with homework.
At nearly three dozen adult education and occupational centers operated by the Los Angeles Unified School District, nearly 300,000 students are enrolled in low-cost programs designed to help them better their lives.
Their fate now lies in the hands of the school board, which is set to vote Tuesday on a budget that would cut the program and divert most of the $200 million in state money earmarked for adult education to ease the district's $557 million deficit.
Their fate now lies in the hands of the school board, which is set to vote Tuesday on a budget that would cut the program and divert most of the $200 million in state money earmarked for adult education to ease the district's $557 million deficit.
While LAUSD leaders say they desperately need the money to fund core programs at K-12 campuses, adult education advocates say the program is essential to building an academic support system for LAUSD parents and training a skilled workforce for Southern California.
"Los Angeles Unified is the perfect storm," said Chris Nelson, president of the 3,000-member California Council for Adult Education. "Ending all services for 300,000 students will have a huge impact -- not only on the students, but on the community."
There is no easy solution to the quandary facing the school district, which is wrestling with how to balance the $6 billion budget for 2012–13.
• Californians Together: Championing the Success of English Learners (PDF)
• Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles (PDF)
 Make a difference in adult education! Join 100–150 members of CCAE as we converge on Sacramento to personally meet with all 120 Legislators or their staff.
Special training is held prior to the visits to assist our members in their meetings. Many members have found this to be the most meaningful activity that they have ever participated in as an adult educator. We have also sponsored successful current and former students and school board members to join this day. Together we can keep adult education in California!
The 2012 CCAE Legislative Day will be held on Monday, March 5, 2012 in Sacramento, with meetings scheduled for Sunday, March 4, 2012. All meetings will be held at the Sheraton Grand unless otherwise noted. Preliminary schedule:
• State Awards Selection Meeting, 1:30 p.m.–2:30 p.m.
Each Section President (or designee) and two Past State Presidents. Chaired by Darlene Neilsen.
• State Legislative Chairs Meeting, 3:00 p.m.–3:45 p.m.
Each Section Legislative Chair and State Executive Board Members that opt to attend.
Chaired by Joanne Durkee.
• Legislative Orientation and Training Meeting, 4:00 p.m.–5:30 p.m.
All Legislative Day Participants. Chaired by Joanne Durkee.
• Section Meetings, 5:30 p.m.–6:00 p.m.
All Legislative Day participants meeting in Section meetings.
• Meeting at State Capitol, 9:00 a.m.–10:00 a.m.
• Scheduled Visitations, 9:00 a.m.–3:00 p.m.
• Debriefing Meeting, 2:30 p.m.–5:00 p.m.
The Sacramento Sheraton Grand Hotel is located at 1230 J Street, one block from the Capitol. Rooms have been reserved on Sunday night at the rate of $129 single or double occupancy. Reservations may be made through February 10, 2012 at this rate. Call 916-447-1700 to reserve your room and mention our organization's name when reserving.
Contact Steve Prantalos (714-536-7354) or Joanne Durkee (925-685-7340, Ext. 2722) if you have any questions or concerns.
January 25, 2012
Hello Everyone,
I want to give you an update about legislation. The Governor has proposed his budget and there are many questions about how adult education will survive in his proposal. Our wonderful Legislative Advocate, Dawn Koepke indicates that at this point, it makes sense not to speak on behalf of CCAE but of your own interest. According to Dawn, CCAE’s statewide advocacy on this issue is being handled in a much more methodical and conscientious manner until we have clarity and, hopefully, an alternative to offer. If you are attending the CAEAA conference, she will be presenting there. Also, she will be participating in our Leg Committee meeting on Friday and providing an in person report on Saturday at our full board meeting.
She also believes that it is okay for members to raise their concerns with Legislators, as individual adult educators and administrators, about Adult Education potentially being included in the Governor’s consolidation proposal; the potential for us to oppose such an approach; and noting the lack of clarity with the proposal and whether or not Adult Education is indeed included will help generate additional buzz as we move forward with our advocacy. It will create a buzz about Adult Education that lets members know that their constituencies are watching this piece closely and will hopefully provide us some added momentum to resolve the issue to our favor.
Also, we have put together a spot bill for adult education that Assemblymember Mike Eng will support. We are looking forward next week to all of you meeting Dawn and helping her to create a more fully developed bill.
Chris Nelson
CCAE State President
Administrator, Adult & Career Education
Oakland Unified School District
2607 Myrtle Street, Oakland, CA 94607
Office: (510) 273-2300 Fax: (510) 452-2077
christian.nelson@ousd.k12.ca.us
January 24, 2012
The 2012–13 Budget proposal recently released by the Governor’s Office contains a recommendation to institute a weighted student funding proposal that further expands flexibility. To quote the Governor’s preface on the education section of the budget:
“The Budget dramatically increases flexibility and local control by consolidating the vast majority of categorical programs (excluding federally required programs such as special education) with revenue limit apportionments into a single stream of funding for schools on a permanent basis.”
The Proposal: This Budget proposal would codify permanently the categorical program flexibility provisions that are due to end in fiscal year 2014–15. The weighted student formula proposes to provide K-12 education funding equally to all districts, and add funding to address the needs of low income and English learner students. At this point Adult Education is in the formula and would lose its distinction. Districts would have discretion on funding categorical programs consolidated into the formula.
The Governor’s staff has announced that they will be examining the use of greater accountability to assure that student needs are being addressed. Legislative provisions on the weighted student formula may be available in early February.
Recent analyses indicate that the Governor’s proposal may not succeed this year because some districts will lose funding while others would gain. However, it is possible that the formula provisions could be enacted into law with a hold harmless provision, and be implemented when state revenues increase.
Timeline: State budgets annually are subject to a process that includes the following steps:
- January 10th: Governor introduced the budget for next fiscal year (July to June)
- February: Legislative Analyst Office comments on the budget
- Feb., March, & April: Legislative committees review and act on the proposed budget. On February 16th, the Senate Budget Committee is scheduled to a hearing on the Education provisions of the budget.
- May 15th: Governor and legislature make adjustments based on updated state revenues
- June 15th: Deadline for the legislature to approve a balanced budget.
- June 30th: Deadline for the Governor to approve a budget for the next fiscal year.
Web Information: State budget information at http:/www.dof.ca.gov/. The weighted student formula is described pages 139–140 of the Budget Summary document.
January 15, 2012
Governor Brown released his FY 2012-13 budget last week that assumes a $92.5 billion General Fund spending plan ($137.33 billion total) with a $9.2 billion deficit to be addressed through $4.2 billion in cuts, $4.6 billion in tax and revenue raising proposals and $1.4 billion in fund shifts and restructuring. Following the path of the 2011-12 budget package, the proposal calls for some additional restructuring and the downsizing of government agencies and programs. New revenues in the form of legislative tax increases are not included in the proposal; however, the balance relies on additional revenues to be generated from the hopeful success of a November ballot initiative that would raise the projected $4.6 billion from temporary increase to higher income earners and a ½ cent sales tax increase. Much like last year, the proposal calls for additional “trigger” cuts that would be enacted should the passage of the November revenue proposal be rejected. The additional trigger cuts would total ~$5.4 billion and would largely be focused on K-14 education, higher education and park closures, among others.
Specific to education funding, the budget builds upon flexibility granted to schools in recent years and gives significant decision-making authority to local school districts. The Brown Administration believes California’s school finance system has become too complex, administratively costly and inequitable. Furthermore, the Administration is concerned that many program allocations have been frozen and no longer reflect demographic and other changes. To remedy these concerns, the Administration is proposing to roll forward FY 11-12 funding levels to FY 12-13 for each program and district followed by a five-year phase-in period toward a singled weighted student formula block grant comprising both revenue limit and flexed categorical funding. The formula will purportedly distribute these combined resources to schools based on weighted factors that account for the variability in costs of educating specific student populations, thereby ensuring that fund will continue to be targeted to schools with large populations of disadvantaged pupils (ESL, etc.). More specifically, it would include a weighted student formula that would provide for per-student funding targets based on a per-student amount that incorporates a “concentration grant” philosophy, meaning that at-risk students pose a greater and costlier challenge when they are the majority of students in a school, rather than a minority.
Ultimately under the proposal, all of the programs that would be replaced by the formula would be immediately flexible for use in supporting any locally determined educational purposes. The proposal would also be paired with accountability measures that would be the basis for evaluating and rewarding school performance. The measures would include quantitative, test-based accountability measures, along with locally developed assessments and qualitative measures of schools.
In instituting these changes, the Administration believes it will increase transparency and help to facilitate greater and more informed involvement of parents and community members in local school financial matters.
Obviously the proposal raises a number of questions and serious concerns for the adult education community. The California Council of Adult Education (CCAE) and California Adult Education Administrators Association (CAEAA) are working vigorously to chart a path for adult education through the budget morass.
Stay tuned…
Dawn Koepke
Legislative Advocate
McHugh & Associates
1121 L Street, Suite 103
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 930-1993
(916) 930-0580 Fax
Trigger Cuts to be Enacted, Affect Education
December 14, 2011
Over the last month, three key state fiscal entities have released financial outlook reports detailing the state’s current revenue situation and providing projections for the upcoming budget year. Democratic Controller John Chiang’s report found state revenues to be $1.5 billion behind the FY 2011–2012 budget revenue projections. It also found the state has overspent during the fiscal year by $1.7 billion and came in $810.5 million short of expectations for October. In the report, the Controller credits the revenue shortfall to lower than expected personal income and corporate tax receipts. The Legislative Analyst’s (LAO) financial outlook found the state to be facing a budget deficit of $13 billion in the next fiscal year (FY 2012–2013). The LAO’s report argues the state will not receive the expected $4 billion in additional revenues as included in the current budget plan—the revenues necessary to avoid trigger cuts.
The Department of Finance released an analysis recently also identifying a sizeable revenue gap for the FY 2011–12 budget package, pegging it at $2.2 billion with revenues in October alone falling $608 million below expectations. Following up on the analysis, the Department and Governor Brown officially released their outlook for the coming year and announced the need to enact the ‘trigger’ cuts outlined in the June budget agreement. As you may recall, the budget plan outlined a tiered system of additional budget cuts to education and social services should state tax revenues fail to meet projections. The tiered cuts included:
• Tier 0: State short up to $1 billion of projection: No additional cuts; push any remaining budget imbalance to the FY 2012–13
• Tier 1: State short $1–2 billion of projection: $600 million worth of cuts to the UC/CSU system, corrections, social services and increase of community college fees by $10 a unit
• Tier 2: State short $2–4 billion of projection: $1.9 billion in cuts to K-12 education ($1.5 billion) and school transportation programs in addition to Tier 1 cuts
Despite the revenue gaps, legislative and agency officials had been optimistic and holding out hope that a surge of revenues would help avoid triggering the additional cuts. Governor Brown, however, put the issue to rest indicating the triggers would indeed be pulled and more cuts are likely when he releases his proposed FY 2012–2013 budget proposal in January. While the trigger cuts will have significant impacts for higher education and child care, K-12 was largely spared facing only a $80 million direct reduction and $248 million through the elimination of school bus funding. This is slight when compared with the $1.5 billion direct cut they faced. Community College impacts will likely lead to a $10/unit fee hike beginning with the 2012 summer term and are likely to remain permanent.
So, what does this mean for adult education? That remains unclear and could ultimately vary from district to district. Governor Brown during his press conference today noted that schools have the flexibility to move funds around. He noted that they would have the option to even backfill school bus funding to the detriment of another categorical program if that was a priority for any particular district. While the overall cuts aren’t as bad as they could have been, funding flexibility remains and could have an impact for further reductions in adult education on a district-by-district basis.
We will continue to monitor the budget situation very closely. We are hopeful that with the passage of AB 189 (Eng, 2011) school districts will be forced to think twice before adopting a budget or reductions that would further impact adult education. As the 2012 legislative session approaches, the California Adult Education Administrators Association (CAEAA) and California Council for Adult Education (CCAE) will be working closely with the Administration and Legislature to stave off further reductions, promote, and ultimately set the basis for restoring funding for adult education in California.
Stay tuned…
Dawn Koepke
Legislative Advocate
McHugh & Associates
1121 L Street, Suite 103
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 930-1993
(916) 930-0580 Fax
Dawn graduated from San Francisco State University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in International Relations and studied abroad at the Universidad de Salamanca in Spain. Dawn also completed her Masters Degree in Public Policy & Administration from California State University, Sacramento.
CCAE welcomes McHugh and Associates and Dawn Koepke to the work ahead of us to ultimately protect adult education funding.
November 8, 2011
Described by supporters as "experienced, intelligent, independent, dedicated and exactly the sort of leader Culver City needs," adult educator, Laura Chardiet won a coveted seat on the Culver City Board of Education in a hotly contested election on November 8, 2011.
November 4, 2011
American Jobs Act
A few weeks ago, the American Jobs Act was brought to the Senate floor where it died quickly. The only way both Democrats and Republicans envision passing job-spurring legislation is in piecemeal form—taking apart the American Jobs Act and voting on various aspects of the bill separately.
The Pathways Back to Work Fund, a program included in the American Jobs Act designed to meet the needs of unemployed, low-skilled workers, includes adult education activities as an allowable use of funds, in addition to other activities that support education and training opportunities for unemployed, low-skilled adults and youth.
However, no one in Congress is talking about the Pathways Back to Work Fund as one of the individual measures that should be debated and passed. We need you to call your U.S. Senators today to change that conversation to include introducing and passing the Pathways Back to Work Fund.
Action: Tell Senators to urge inclusion of the Pathways Back to Work Fund as part of any jobs legislation moving forward.
Click here to quickly locate your Senators’ contact information.
WIA Reauthorization
WIA Reauthorization has not seen significant movement since June 2011, when the Semate HELP Committee staff released a discussion draft for feedback from advocacy groups. Mark up on the Senate draft, originally scheduled for June 2011, continues to be stalled over an issue in Title I related to the Workforce Investment Boards’ composition.
However, recently WIA—or at least discussion of adult education and workforce development—has shown a bit of movement in the House. On June 16, 2011, Congressman Hinojosa (D-TX) reintroduced the Adult Education and Economic Growth (AEEG) Act, and on October 4, 2011, the House Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Training, chaired by Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC), held a hearing on “Modernizing the Workforce Investment Act.” The hearing was focused on Title I and workforce training. Overall themes from the witnesses’ included: 1) giving more flexibility to workforce development programs while still requiring accountability; 2) eliminating government bureaucracy; and 3) focusing on meeting the needs of local business.
Even though this was a hearing focused on Title I, Congressman Phil Roe (R-TN) began his remarks by emphasizing the need for adult education and literacy, continuing to advocate for the important need for these services. See it on You Tube: http://bit.ly/n1qbDi . Congressman Dave Loebsack (D-IA) commented, “We need to strengthen and fund both the workforce training and adult education systems in order to create jobs.” While discussions continue about WIA reauthorization at the Committee level, it is unclear as to whether or not a draft bill will be introduced this fall or if it will be pushed aside once again as the Committee refocuses its attention on the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education (ESEA) Act.
Action: We need to keep House Members, especially those on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, informed of our WIA reauthorization priorities and latest adult education and literacy facts to ensure we are at the table during their ongoing discussions. If you have a House Member on this Committee, you should contact him or her and update your Member on your community’s adult education successes and needs:
Democrats |
Republicans |
Congressman, George Miller
7th Congressional District
Concord Office
1333 Willow Pass Road, Ste. 203
Concord, CA 94520
Phone: (925) 602-1880
Fax: (925) 674-0983
|
Congressman, Buck McKeon
25th Congressional District
Santa Clarita Office
26650 The Old Road
Suite 203
Santa Clarita, CA 91381
Phone: (661) 254-2111
Fax: (661) 254-2380
|
Congresswoman, Lynn Woolsey
6th Congressional District
Marin Office
1050 Northgate Drive Suite 354
San Rafael, CA 94903
Phone: (415) 507-9554
Fax: (415) 507-9601 |
Congressman, Duncan Hunter
52nd Congressional District
El Cajon Office
1870 Cordell Ct, Ste 206
El Cajon, CA 92020
Phone: (619) 448-5201
Fax: (619) 449-2251 |
Congresswoman, Susan Davis
53rd Congressional District
2700 Adams Avenue
Suite 102
San Diego, CA 92116
Phone: (619) 280-5353
Fax: (619) 280-5311 |
|
A primary objective of CCAE is to assist in the development and passage of legislation that provides positive benefits for adult schools, students, staff members and communities. We work with State Legislators and government officials to achieve this goal by initiating specific legislation, testifying at hearings, and disseminating important legislative updates and information to our constituents.
Legislative Advocate—CCAE employs, on a part-time basis, a highly regarded Legislative Advocate—Dawn Sanders Koepke. She tracks pertinent legislation, meets regularly with both our State Legislative Committee and our State Board and Officers, and works directly with Legislators on key bills and initiatives.
Annual Legislative Day—During the spring of every year, 100–150 members of CCAE converge on Sacramento to meet personally with all 120 Legislators or their staff. Special training is held prior to the visits to assist our members in their meetings. Many members have found this to be the most meaningful activity that they have ever participated as an adult educator. We have also sponsored successful current and former students and school board members to join in this day.
State Legislative Committee—Each of our six sections select a Section Legislative Chair who meets quarterly with the Legislative Lobbyist and our State Legislative Chair. They discuss current issues and pending legislation and give direction to the Lobbyist regarding our position on these bills. Discussion also takes place at our Annual Planning Meeting on possible bills and issues we would like to have promoted with the Legislature.
Legislative Network—Section Legislative Chairs communicate with local Chapter Presidents and Chapter Legislative Chairs on a regular basis. They carry back information on what is taking place in Sacramento, and bring forth ideas from local members regarding possible legislative initiatives. |
|
 Please take a moment to view the following video messages supporting adult education from actor and director, Edward James Olmos and from actor, George Takei.
• Edward James Olmos Video—Save Adult Education
• George Takei Video—The Importance of Adult Education
February 11, 2012—Adult Education on LAUSD Chopping Block...More
February 10, 2012—A Message from the California Department of Education: Elimination of Adult Education Opportunities...More
January 28, 2012—Adult Education on L.A. Unified's Chopping Block, Read the full article in the Los Angeles Times...More
January 25, 2012—Legislative Update from CCAE State President, Chris Nelson...More
January 24, 2012—Does California Adult Education Disappear with Brown's Weighted Student Pupil Funding Proposal?...More
January 15, 2012—Brown Administration's Budget Builds Upon Current Flexibility...More
December 13, 2011—Department of Finance Trigger Cuts...More
December 8, 2011—Final Draft of Adult Education Strategic Plan is available: Linking Adults to Opportunity: Transformation of the California Department of Education Adult Education Program (PDF)
November 30, 2011—Legislative Advocacy Changes for CCAE...More
March 5, 2012—CCAE Annual Legislative Day
• Adult Education Enrollment by Program 1990 to 1999
• Adult Education Learners by Instructional Program 1999–2000 and 2001–2002
• California Adult Education Provider Directory
• California Department of Education (CDE)—Adult Education
• California Legislature Information
• CDE Adult Education Facts
• LINKING ADULTS TO OPPORTUNITY: Transformation of the California Department of Education Adult Education Program (Strategic Plan)
• Outreach & Technical Assistance Network (OTAN) for Adult Educators
Joanne Durkee, Chair
Bay Section
Mt. Diablo Adult Education
1266 San Carlos Avenue
Concord, CA 94518
(925) 798-7340
durkeej@mdusd.org
Vittoria Maghsoudi
Bay Section
Mt. Diablo Adult Education
1266 San Carlos Avenue
Concord, CA 94518
Lariann Torrez
Central Section
Tulare Adult Education
575 West Maple Ave.,
Tulare, CA 93274
Work:
(559) 686-0225,
Fax: (559) 687-7447,
Cell: (559) 920-0664
larriann.torrez@tulare.k12.ca.us
Phil Dwyer
LA Metro Section
LAUSD-Evan CAS
717 N. Figueroa St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 626-7151
(231) 626-4487 (Fax)
pdwyer@lausd.net
Candace Lee
LA Metro
LAUSD-Metro Skills Center
2801 W. 6th Street
Los Angeles, CA 90057
(323) 567-5603
(323) 567-7990 (Fax)
candace.lee@lausd.net
Cris Johnson
Northern Section
Sacramento City Adult Education
5241 J Street
Sacramento, CA 95817
(916) 452-1431
criskingjohnson@yahoo.com
Mike Neary
Southern
San Bernardino Adult School
1200 N. E Street
San Bernardino, CA 92405
(909) 388-6000
• Please join or renew your membership today!
• CCAE is unique in that membership is available to Teachers, Administrators, Classified Staff Members, Counselors, Students, and Friends of Adult Education.
• For more information please click on the button below to find out how you can become a member of CCAE or renew your membership.
Address:
PO Box 978
Los Alamitos, CA 90720-0978
Phone: 888-542-2231
Fax: 866-941-5129
Email: membership@ccaestate.org
Website: ccaestate.org
Follow us on:
 
|
Dawn Koepke will be our legislative liaison and joined McHugh & Associates in December 2003 lobbying in the areas of public safety, health and human services, environmental issues, and now will focus her attention on adult education.
